Review

Comparison of Hybrid and Single Dyes for DSSCs: Fabrication, Efficiency, and Economic Evaluation

Seungho Shin 1 * , Kao-Wei Min 2
More Detail
1 Mountain Cherry Academy, Yongin-si 16916, Korea2 Department of Electrical Engineering, Cheng Shiu University, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan* Corresponding Author
Applied Functional Materials, 6(3), September 2026, 1-6, https://doi.org/10.35745/afm2026v06.03.0001
Submitted: 16 March 2026, Published: 30 August 2026
OPEN ACCESS   17 Views   9 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

As the global community needs sustainable alternatives to silicon-based photovoltaics, dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have been regarded as a third-generation technology due to their low-cost fabrication and tunable aesthetics. However, the efficiency of single-sensitizer systems, including high-cost ruthenium complexes and low-stability natural pigments, remains constrained by narrow absorption spectra and rapid charge recombination. The transition from single to hybrid dye systems highlights the technical and economic necessity of multi-chromophore and metal-doped architectures. By integrating previous results on silver doping and cocktail sensitization, hybrid dye systems achieve panchromatic absorption and a significant reduction in the semiconductor bandgap by up to 3.0 eV. The results of this review provide a reference for the development of next-generation sensitizers that offer industrial-grade stability and a lower levelized cost of electricity, facilitating the integration of DSSCs into building-integrated photovoltaics and portable electronics.

CITATION (APA)

Shin, S., & Min, K.-W. (2026). Comparison of Hybrid and Single Dyes for DSSCs: Fabrication, Efficiency, and Economic Evaluation. Applied Functional Materials, 6(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.35745/afm2026v06.03.0001

REFERENCES

  1. Machin, A.; Márquez, F. Advancements in Photovoltaic Cell Materials: Silicon, Organic, and Perovskite Solar Cells. Materials 2024, 17, 1165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17051165.
  2. Rahman, S.; Haleem, A.; Siddiq, M.; et al. Research on dye-sensitized solar cells: recent advancement toward the various constituents of dye-sensitized solar cells for efficiency enhancement and future prospects. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 35877. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA06258A.
  3. Arkan, F.; Pakravesh, F.; Barati Darband, F.; et al. Recent progress toward high-performance dye-sensitized solar cells: a review. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2024, 21, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13738-024-02967-2.
  4. O’Regan, B.; Grätzel, M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO₂ films. Nature 1991, 353, 737–740. https://doi.org/10.1038/353737a0.
  5. Grätzel, M. Dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C. 2003, 4, 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-5567(03)00026-1.
  6. Debnath, A.; Bhattacharjee, S.K.; Sutradhar, R.; et al. A review on natural dyes as a sensitizer in dye-sensitized solar cells. Interactions 2024, 245, 325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10751-024-02172-w.
  7. Shukor, N.I.A.; Chan, K.-Y.; Thien, G.S.H.; et al. A green approach to natural dyes in dye-sensitized solar cells. Sensors 2023, 23, 8412. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23208412.
  8. Ramadan, F.M.; Badawy, S.A.; Abdel-Latif, E. et al. Ternary co-sensitization with SQ-2 and indole-based dyes boosts DSSC efficiency by 49% over N719 benchmark. J. Mater. Sci. 2026, 61, 1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-025-11906-2.
  9. Hussain, M.; Jalali, T.; Maftoon-Azad, L. et al.Optimizing DSSC dyes: investigating synergistic interactions of chlorophyll b and anthocyanin with TiO₂ through TD-DFT methodology. Mater. Adv. 2025, 6, 9272. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5MA00800J.
  10. Nurosyid, F.; et al. Optoelectronic properties of combinations of anthocyanin, betalain, and chlorophyll doped with Ag metal as the photosensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cell. Evergreen 2024, 11, 2135. https://doi.org/10.5109/7236857.
  11. Amogne, N.Y.; Ayele, D.W.; Tsigie, Y.S. Recent advances in anthocyanin dyes extracted from plants for dye-sensitized solar cell. Mater. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2020, 9, 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40243-020-00183-5.
  12. Li, X.; Song, P.; Zhao, D.; Li, Y. Theoretical investigation on photophysical properties of triphenylamine and coumarin dyes. Materials 2020, 13, 4834. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214834.
  13. García-Salinas, M.J.; Ariza, M.J. Optimizing a simple natural dye production method for dye-sensitized solar cells: Examples for betalain (Bougainvillea and beetroot extracts) and anthocyanin dyes. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2515. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122515.
  14. Rahmatulloh, A.; Hidayati, M.D. The assembly and performance assessment of dye-sensitized solar cells with cassava leaf (Manihot esculenta) extract as sensitizer. Int. J. Adv. Multidiscip. Res. Stud. 2025, 5, 1724. https://www.multiresearchjournal.com/arclist/list-2025.5.3/id-4518.
  15. Ninan, G.G.; Varghese, M.; Devanarayanan, M.; Balachandran, M. Controlled reaction time of TiO₂ and cocktail co-sensitization for improved DSSC performance. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2024, 35, 1800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-024-13589-y.
  16. Subhan, A.; Dharmalingam, K.; Mourad, A.-H.I. et al. Improved photovoltaic performance of dye-sensitized solar cells upon doping with pulsed-laser fabricated plasmonic silver nanoparticles as modified photoanodes. Mater. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2025, 14, 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40243-025-00315-9.